A Timeline of Key Events in the Babri Masjid - Ram Temple Controversy

 

1529Babri Mosque constructed by Mir Baqi.

 

1885: Court Dispute Begins -  Mahant Raghubir Das files the first suit in the matter, seeking to build a temple on land adjoining the mosque.  The Faizabad District Magistrate (DM) refuses him permission. Next, Mahant Raghubir Das files a title suit in Faizabad Court against the Secretary of State for India, seeking permission to build a temple on the chabutra (courtyard) of the Babri mosque. Faizabad Court rejects his plea.

 

Dec 1949: Ram Idol Appears inside the Mosque  - On the night of 22nd December, a Ram Idol appears inside the mosque. Hindus see the appearance of the Idol as a divine revelation, however many argue that the Idol was smuggled inside at night. Hindus start offering prayers.

 

The Government declares the site as a “contested area” and locks the entrance.

 

1950: Hindu sides file Suits – Two suits are filed in Faizabad Court by Gopal Simla Viharad and Paramhansa Ramachandra Das, seeking permissiong to conduct Hindu pujas to Ram Lalla. The Court granted the parties permission to conduct pujas. The Court orders the inner courtyard gates to remain locked.

 

1959: Thid Hindu suit filed - Nirmohi Akhara files third suit, seeking possession of the land.                    

 

1961Muslim suit filed - UP Sunni Wakf Board files a suit seeking possession of Babri Mosque site. They also demand the removal of Ram Idols from Babri Masjid.

 

1984: Ram Janmbhoomi Movement commences - Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) constitutes a group to start the Ram Janmbhoomi Movement. BJP leader LK Advani is made the leader of the campaign.

 

1st February, 1986: Inner Gate of Babri Mosque opened -  A third party, lawyer UC Pandey appeals for the gates to be unlocked before the Faizabad Session Court, on the grounds that the Faizabad district administration, and not a Court, had ordered its closure.

 

District Judge orders the locks to be removed to allow Hindu “pooja and darshan”. Muslims constitute a Babri Mosque Action Committee (BMAC) in protest.

 

July 1, 1989, Lawsuit filed in the name of Ram Lalla Virajman (Lord Ram)

 

November 9, 1989: Shilanayas performed - PM Rajiv Gandhi allows the VHP to perform Shilanayas (laying of foundation stone) near disputed area.

 

1989: Lawsuits shifted to Allahabad High Court

 

September 25, 1990: Rath Yatra - LK Advani launches a Rath Yatra from Somnath (Gujarat) to Ayodhya (UP) to incite support for the Movement. Communal riots break out.

 

December 6, 1992: Babri demolished - Babri Mosque razed by violent mob of Karsevaks. The Karsevaks leave behind a make-shift temple in its place.

 

December 16, 1992: Liberhan Commission formed - 10 days after the Mosque was demolished, the PM forms a committee led by retired High Court Judge M. S. Liberhan, to look into circumstances leading to the demolition of the Babri Mosque and the communal riots. The Commission was originally mandated to submit its report within three months of its formation.

 

January 7, 1993: State acquires Ayodhya land - Narsimha Rao Government issues an ordinance acquiring 67.7 acres of land (Site and adjoining areas). Later it was passed as a law – Acquisition of Certain Areas at Ayodhya Act, 1993 to facilitate acquisition of land by Central government.

 

1994: Ismail Faruqui Judgment – The SC by a majority of 3:2 upheld the constitutionality of Acquisition of Certain Areas at Ayodhya Act.

 

The majority judgment by former CJI JS Verma reasoned that every religious immovable property is liable to be acquired. The SC adjudged that offering namaz at mosque was not integral to Islam unless that mosque had any particular significance in Islam. The judgment has been criticized for regarding the mosque as a non-essential place of worship.

 

There were no reviews filed against Ismail Faruqui

 

April 2002: Ayodhya Title Dispute case begins - The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court begins hearing Ayodhya Title Dispute.

 

March - August 2003: ASI Survey - Archaeological Survey of India begins excavating the land underneath the disputed site on the directions of the Allahabad High Court. It claims to have found remnants of a 10th century Hindu Temple. Muslims question the ASI report.

 

June 30th, 2009: Liberhan Commission report submitted - After a delay of 17 years, the Librehan Commission submits its report to the Prime Minister, though its contents are not made public.

 

September 30, 2010: Allahabad HC splits land in three ways - The High Court delivers its judgment, dividing the land between three parties: one third for the Sunni Wakf Board, one third for the Nirmohi Akhara and one third to Ram Lalla Virajman.

 

The judgment of the Lucknow Bench of the HC of September 30, 2010, which divided the disputed land in Ayodhya in 2:1 ratio among the Muslim and Hindu litigants.


The HC allotted the dome of the demolished Babri Masjid, under which the makeshift temple currently stands, to the Hindus. The structure was demolished by a group of Karsevaks on December 6, 1992. The nearby Ram Chabutra and Sita Rasoi also went to the Nirmohi Akhara. The one-third share of the Sunni Wakf Board comprise the outer courtyard of the disputed land.

 

May 2011: Supreme Court stays Allahabad High Court ruling - The SC admits a batch of petitions filed by all parties. A Division Bench of Justices Aftam Alam and R.M. Lodha term the High Court Judgment as “strange”. RM Lodha observs "a new dimension has been given by the High Court as the decree of partition was not sought by the parties. It was not prayed for by anyone. It has to be stayed. It’s a strange order. How can a decree for partition be passed when none of the parties had prayed for it?..”

 

March 21, 2017: Former Chief Justice Khehar suggests an out of court settlement among all parties.

 

August 11, 2017: 3 judge bench of SC starts hearing the matter - The 3 judge bench of SC comprising CJI Dipak Misra, Justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer began hearing the appeal.

 

Feb – July 2018:  The petitioners argue that the SC ought to refer the 1994 Ismail Faruqui judgment to a 7-judge Bench for reconsideration.

 

July 20, 2018: SC reserves verdict - The SC reserves judgment on the question of referring the appeal to a larger Bench

 

September 27, 2018: SC refuses to form a larger Bench - The 3 judge bench in a split of 2:1 verdict held that the Ismail Faruqui judgment of 1994 does not require reconsideration by a larger bench.

 

A 3-judge bench will hear the case starting in January 2019.